On behalf of Bichamp Cutting Technology EMEA, the Fraunhofer IPA investigated the influence of various bi-metal band saw tools on process stability and cut quality. In a scientific benchmark test, tools from established manufacturers were evaluated under comparable conditions.
Band sawing is an established industrial cutting process and often the first step in a manufacturing chain. The quality of the cut and the stability of the sawing process can have a direct impact on subsequent machining steps, costs, and material usage.
As part of a benchmark initiated by BICHAMP Cutting Technology EMEA GmbH, the Fraunhofer IPA investigated the influence of various bi-metal band saw tools on the band sawing process. The goal was to evaluate tools from established manufacturers under comparable conditions and to demonstrate their influence on process stability and cut quality using objective, reproducible parameters.
The focus was thus on band saw tools. The scientific question was how to make tool differences visible and comparable using objective, repeatable parameters.
From a scientific perspective, it was particularly important to systematically document the tool’s influence on various quality and process parameters. To this end, evaluation criteria were developed, appropriate measurement and sensor technology were employed, and the tools were tested under comparable conditions. The project followed a structured experimental design:
The study showed that the defined evaluation criteria are generally suitable for the structured evaluation of band saw tools and their impact on the process.
Across the parameters examined, the tools under investigation achieved an overall comparable level of performance. While individual deviations in certain measured variables were observable, they did not result in a clear tool-specific trend. Taking the respective variances into account, the results as a whole fell within a comparable range.
At the same time, systematic correlations between individual process and quality parameters were identified, which form an important basis for further analysis.
Another project outcome is a machine-independent measurement setup that will allow other band saw machines, materials, and tool concepts to be examined in the future using a comparable principle.
The benchmark establishes a scientifically sound foundation for objectively evaluating band saw tools under real-world conditions. This provides companies with new insights into the influence of tools on quality and process stability, as well as a robust basis for future optimizations of the band sawing process.
The developed method can be used in the future to:
The benchmark thus not only provides a comparison of the tools examined but also lays the foundation for further scientific research and the targeted optimization of industrial band-sawing processes.
The figure shows an example of the optical measurement of the wear mark width on a band saw tooth. As a direct measure of the wear condition of the tool teeth, the wear mark width was recorded at defined intervals after 5, 15, 35, 55, 75, and 100 cuts. The measurement was performed in parallel with other offline evaluation criteria.
The width of the wear marks is an established, tool-specific criterion for evaluating tool life, as it directly reflects progressive wear.
The arithmetic mean roughness value Ra and the average roughness depth Rz were determined at defined measurement positions as quality criteria for the quantitative assessment of cut surface quality. The determined roughness parameters enable an objective evaluation of the resulting surface as well as the influence of the tool and its wear condition on cut quality.
»A systematic approach and open collaboration. I’m very satisfied!«
Michael Möller (BICHAMP Cutting Technology EMEA GmbH, CEO)
Would you like to compare tools, products, or processes objectively and under real-world conditions? We’ll develop a benchmark methodology tailored to your specific needs.